The Veil of MosesUnless otherwise noted, all Scriptures are from the NKJV
In the above passage the apostle Paul contrasts the Old and New Covenants. Although the Old Covenant was glorious, it was a glory that was passing away. It was the letter that kills, a ministry of death and condemnation. It was also a physical covenant, written on stones and lived out in the priesthood and the Levitical law. In contrast, the New Covenant is of the Spirit, and lived out in the Spirit — where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord. This transforming process takes place by the inner man being conformed to the Spirit of God, not by the outer man conforming to external laws, as with the Old Covenant:
Paul uses the veil of Moses, which dimmed the passing glory of the countenance of his face, as an allegory of the Old Covenant, with its passing glory, veiling the surpassing glory of the New Covenant. While the Old Covenant spoke in types and shadows, the New Covenant was proclaimed with great boldness (KJV = plainness, YLT = freedom) of speech. Whereas Moses covered his face with a veil that the Israelites might not look steadily at what was passing away, Paul states that the gospel is proclaimed boldly, for the veil is removed in Christ. Several commentators make note of this fact. To preserve our flow of thought, we have included these comments in Appendix A. We provide two quotations here as samples:
Many of the Jews’ conceptions of the teachings of the Old Testament were incorrect because they failed to realize that the Old Covenant was merely a shadow of the New Covenant. The New Testament confirms that the material things of the Old Covenant were copies, shadows and symbols of spiritual counterparts found in the New Covenant:
Wycliffe, whose commentary appears in Appendix A, makes an observation that, while most would give assent to, many have failed to apprehend the ramifications--our opening passage in 2 Corinthians is Paul’s inspired interpretation of the Old Testament! The same Spirit that inspired Moses as he penned the accounts contained in the Pentateuch also inspired Paul to interpret and expound upon portions of that text. As 2 Timothy 3:16 says, All Scripture is inspired by God . . . (NASU). Some would say that the Scripture referred to here is only the Old Testament. But Peter equates the writings of Paul with the Old Testament Scriptures:
If we believe that Peter was inspired as he wrote this, then we have confirmation that when Paul comments on the Old Testament, it is an inspired commentary. Furthermore, if we accept that our present New Testament was written and compiled under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, then we have in our possession an inspired commentary on many Old Testament passages. Granted, it is not a verse-by-verse commentary, but concerning those passages that it does interpret, we would do well to put every volume written by man back on the shelf, and discover WHAT DOES THE SCRIPTURE SAY? For every commentary written by man, no matter his education, insight, inspiration or communication skills, is the product of a fallible being. The New Testament, however, was authored by the Holy Spirit, whose ministry it is to lead people into the Truth:
Unfortunately, instead of interpreting the Old Testament through the lens of the New Testament, we tend to do just the opposite. Because the Old Testament is older than the New Testament, and is positioned first in our Bibles, we have a mental picture of it as the foundation upon which the New Testament is built. Thus we try to harmonize our individual interpretations of the New Testament with our pre-established interpretations of the Old Testament. While it is true that all 66 books of the Bible are inspired, and that the Bible is truly “one book”, we have failed to completely grasp the interrelation of those books, particularly between the two testaments. We tend to view the Bible as 66 volumes, which we attempt to interpret with the use of external Lexicons, Commentaries, Dictionaries, etc. What we have failed to fully appreciate is that the last 27 books are, in many instances, a divinely inspired Lexicon, Commentary, Dictionary, etc., for the first 39 books. Again, not a verse-by-verse commentary, but enough of a commentary to establish interpretative principles that should cause us to take a hard look at what is espoused in uninspired commentaries, regardless of their popularity or appeal. This is not to say that the Holy Spirit doesn’t still inspire preachers, teachers and authors, but this is a different level of inspiration. We believe that the Canon falls under the type of inspiration described in 2 Peter 1:21 . . . for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit, while all other inspiration falls under 1 Corinthians 14:32 The spirits of prophets are subject to the control of prophets (NIV). In those areas that the New Testament interprets the Old Testament, it should be the first, last and final word. Instead of (re)interpreting the New Testament to fit our a priori interpretation of the Old Testament, all Old Testament interpretations should align themselves with those passages which are divinely interpreted for us by the New Testament. Once the New Testament authors establish a precedent for interpreting particular Old Testament texts, we must accept nothing less than scriptural support to deviate from that precedent. As Max R. King states in The Spirit of Prophecy:
Milton S. Terry says the following in Biblical Hermeneutics (note that hermeneutics is the study of the methodological principles of interpretation):
We believe that Terry’s point — the Old Testament cannot be fully apprehended without the help of the New — cannot be over-emphasized. The Old Testament contained mysteries that were not fully revealed apart from the Gospel. There were truths in the Old Testament that were shrouded in darkness, awaiting the “flood of light” of revelation to the New Testament apostles and prophets to be shed upon them. This is confirmed by the following passages:
Paul states that the mystery of Christ was not revealed prior to the Gospel age. Therefore, to formulate any doctrine apart from the fuller revelation of the New Testament apostles is attempting to build a house before the foundation is finished. This is because the revelation given to the New Testament apostles was not merely building upon the foundation laid by the Old Testament prophets--it was part of that foundation:
This revelation to the apostles and prophets is the removing of the veil of Moses. What was previously a mystery, and veiled in types and shadows, was now revealed by the Holy Spirit. We believe that Pentecost, and the subsequent ministry of the Holy Spirit in the early church, is a pivot point in understanding the truths of God:
At the end of Acts 1, just prior to Pentecost, the apostles cast lots to find a replacement for Judas, to be numbered among the twelve. This seems to be such an unspiritual solution for such a weighty matter. Perhaps this is why, after being chosen by the lot to be numbered with the other eleven apostles, Matthias is never mentioned again. Paul, on the other hand, is stated as being an apostle no less than nine times. Christ Himself didn’t choose the original twelve apostles (disciples) until after spending a night in prayer:
But after Pentecost, the apostles never use lots again. It is the Spirit that directs their lives, using a vision to send Peter to the Gentiles, forbidding Paul to minister in Asia, setting apart Paul and Barnabas for the gospel, etc. Similarly, they now understood the Scriptures--the veil of Moses had been removed! Prior to Pentecost, the apostles (disciples) were fairly ignorant as to the meaning of Scripture. Any understanding of the Scriptures they had, apart from their traditional background, was limited to either direct teaching or special revelation:
Although they lacked discernment during Christ’s ministry, after Pentecost the apostles understood the Scriptures. For example, Peter begins by immediately expounding on Joel’s prophecy and Philip is able to explain Isaiah 53 to the Eunuch:
This newfound insight into the Scriptures is too easily glossed over. We cannot over-emphasize its importance, for it is the very crux to understanding Biblical truths. Prior to Pentecost, the New Testament saints could only apprehend what was behind the veil of Moses either by special revelation from God, or by specific teaching from Jesus. After Pentecost, however, when the Holy Spirit was poured out upon all believers, they understood the Scriptures, and the mysteries of God were revealed to the apostles. Thus the veil is removed in Christ, because those who turn to Him receive His Spirit, Who gives spiritual discernment:
Just as the page between Malachi and Matthew separates the Old and New Testaments; just as the death and resurrection of Christ separates the Old and New Covenants; so the day of Pentecost separates the veiled understanding of Scripture from the unveiled understanding of Scripture. Before Pentecost, Peter needed a revelation from the Father to recognize Jesus as the Messiah. After Pentecost, the Holy Spirit can reveal that to us through the written Word:
Prior to Pentecost the disciples had to ask in ignorance, “explain to us . . .”, because their understanding was based upon the incomplete teaching of the Scribes and Pharisees. After Pentecost the disciples were explaining the Scriptures to others with confidence, and the Scribes and Pharisees marveled, knowing that they were uneducated and untrained. What was hidden to the “wise” of that age had been revealed to the “babes” of Christianity. Thus, the wise of that age had become foolish, because through their wisdom they did not know God:
Even the Old Testament prophets did not completely understand their own prophecies, because they were hidden (at least in part) until the days of the New Testament apostles:
After Pentecost, the Holy Spirit not only revealed the mysteries of God to the New Testament apostles and prophets, He taught all believers the truth:
The Gospels were written after Pentecost, and thus with hindsight the authors were able to say, “this was done that the words of the prophet might be fulfilled”. We believe that the disciples didn’t recognize at the time that prophecy was being fulfilled before their eyes (except in a very limited way), but after Pentecost they did, and therefore pointed it out as often as possible in the gospels. But notice who is informing the people of all of this fulfilled prophecy in the Gospels--a tax collector, an understudy of a fisherman, a (possibly Gentile) doctor, and a fisherman. Not the religious leaders, not the scribes, Sadducees nor Pharisees:
While the authors of the Gospels were able to recognize and document fulfilled prophecy after Pentecost, notice that they also documented the disciples’ lack of Scriptural discernment prior to Pentecost. Since all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (2 Tim 3:16), we feel that the Holy Spirit inspired these authors to document this previous lack of discernment in order to illustrate the change that took place at Pentecost. The closing words of Malachi are followed by what are known as the “four-hundred years of silence”. During that period there is no record of any inspired words from God. That silence was broken by the ministry of John the Baptist. Yet his message was contrary to tradition, for he dismissed the importance of Jewish heritage in the kingdom of God:
Not only did John understand that the true children of Abraham were not the physical Jews, he also knew that he was the fulfillment of the forerunner to the Messiah:
John was able to look behind the veil of Moses, and thus understand the fulfillment of prophecy and discern the nature of the kingdom of God. This is in stark contrast to the disciples, who didn’t understand that John was the Elijah to come, nor, as we shall see in coming chapters, did they understand the nature of the kingdom of God. How was John able to “see” behind the veil of Moses, when the disciples weren’t? Because, unlike the disciples, who had to wait until Pentecost, he was filled with the Holy Spirit from conception:
Jesus continued in this vein of proclaiming a fulfillment to prophecy that was contrary to current tradition. After being baptized by John, which marked the beginning of His public ministry, He was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the Devil. He returned from the wilderness in the power of the Spirit, and proclaimed in the synagogue that He had just fulfilled the words of the prophet Isaiah. His subsequent commentary filled those in the synagogue with such rage that they tried to kill Him!
Certainly no one would argue that both John the Baptist and Jesus were fulfilling Old Testament prophecy. But they were doing it in a manner that did not conform to the teaching of the religious leaders of their day. The religious leaders of the day did not even recognize that Jesus was the Messiah. They knew all of the passages concerning Him, but wrongly interpreted them. When asked, they knew that He was to be born in Bethlehem, yet they didn’t recognize the Child that was born there. As we saw in the previous chapter, the disciples didn’t recognize John the Baptist as Elijah. Neither the disciples nor the religious leaders could see behind the veil. This is why we mustn’t build our theology upon those “experts” of the law, but upon the inspired revelations of the New Testament authors. After Pentecost the mysteries of God, which were hidden in previous ages, were revealed to those authors. But as we shall see, what was revealed to them was in sharp contrast to what they had been brought up to believe. God was doing a new thing:
The New Testament apostles continued what began with the teaching of John the Baptist and Jesus--clarifying the Old Testament prophecies. The above passage is very reminiscent of the ministry of John the Baptist, which we have already seen was associated with the Gospel:
By inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the New Testament authors were rightly interpreting Old Testament prophecies. Therefore, rather than letting the theological elite interpret the Old Testament for us, we must allow the inspired authors of the New Testament to interpret the Old Testament. Then we are truly letting Scripture interpret Scripture, instead of letting man interpret Scripture. To construct a theology based solely upon the Old Testament (or to force our understanding of the New Testament to fit traditional Old Testament theology) is to formulate doctrine before all of the facts are in. Those missing facts were revealed to the apostles and prophets of the New Testament. As we shall see in the coming chapters, it was because the Jews based their theology solely upon the Old Testament that they were in such opposition to the Christian Church, just as they were with Jesus. The Church, which had the full revelation, could now correctly formulate doctrine and reveal that which had previously been a mystery. Those Jews who accepted the full revelation removed the veil of Moses and became sons and daughters of God (John 1:12). Those who stubbornly refused that revelation continued on in their inadequately founded doctrine, and the veil of Moses remained over their hearts. Because it was to the apostles and prophets of the New Testament that the mysteries of God were revealed, we feel that it is with them that the search for understanding Bible prophecy must begin and end. Again, this is not to say that we cannot benefit from the education and gifting of others within the Body of Christ. However, we must come to all extra-biblical interpretations with the same attitude as the Bereans:
Do the interpretations in the commentaries on our shelves regarding Old Testament prophecy (and by implication, our understanding of it) agree with the interpretations presented by the New Testament authors? As Paul wrote his epistle to the Corinthians, he said that the Jews still had a “veil” over their hearts when Moses was read. Yet they were experts in the law (so NIV, Darby = “doctors of the law”, most versions read “lawyers”). But their expertise was only in studying and interpreting the veil, not discerning the truth hidden behind it. The veil is only removed in Christ, therefore if we are to discern the truth represented by the types and shadows of the Old Covenant, our starting place should be with those who did turn to Him--the inspired authors of the New Testament. As mentioned earlier, the precedent of the New Testament authors understanding Old Testament prophecy is established for us in the Gospels, which were written after Pentecost. In them we often read a phrase such as “that it might be fulfilled what was spoken by the prophet . . .”.
Perhaps it was because most of the Jews had completely missed the fact of these fulfilled prophecies, that the Gospel authors took pains to establish these fulfillments. In essence, what they were saying was, “this is what’s behind the veil”. They were trying to reveal as much as possible. In Appendix B we provide a list of references where the Gospel authors are declaring fulfilled Old Testament prophecy. Even though the Gospel authors were writing after-the-fact, they still felt it necessary to explain the fulfillments of these Old Testament prophecies. Why? Because those fulfillments did not necessarily meet the expectations of their contemporaries. The Gospel authors were providing an inspired commentary on those Old Testament passages that did not agree with the traditional interpretations of their day. What we have failed to fully grasp is that this action continues past the Gospels, into Acts and the Epistles. As we shall see, the interpretations that the New Testament authors provide are often markedly different than the prevailing teachings even of today. But we must remember that those interpretations were also markedly different from the prevailing teachings of their contemporaries. This led to the persecution of Jesus and the Christians by the Jews. In choosing between markedly different interpretations of Old Testament passages, and in establishing doctrine, mustn’t we choose the inspired authors of the New Testament over and against any theologian or prophecy expert, past or present? In order to establish a Biblical interpretation of the New Covenant, and the time and nature of the return of the Mediator of that covenant (Heb 8:6; 9:15; 12:24), shouldn’t we first complete the foundation upon which that interpretation is built? This can only be done by adding the inspired interpretation of the New Testament authors. Anything that doesn’t conform to that foundation must surely be questioned. In the preceding chapter we asked, “are we willing to receive it?” In this chapter we ask, “are we willing to lay aside the tradition of man in favor of the inspiration of the New Testament authors?” Many of the Jews, to whom the very oracles of God were entrusted (Rom 3:2), answered no to both questions. Thus Paul lamented, but even to this day, when Moses is read, a veil lies on their heart. |